State adopts phosphorous standard for MN rivers & streams

Image: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
 

 

Published July 15, 2014. Learn more about the relationship between agriculture and the Mississippi River.

 

--

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency recently approved new, long-overdue standards for excess nutrients (i.e., phosphorus) and algae in Minnesota's rivers and streams. These standards were a priority for Friends of the Mississippi River and represent an important victory for water quality in Minnesota.

Phosphorus pollution & eutrophication

Phosphorus is a common element in the environment and is essential for plant growth and health. However, excess phosphorus in waters can harm aquatic life and recreation by reducing water clarity, depleting dissolved oxygen and causing toxic algal blooms.

River eutrophication is the term scientists use to describe excessive algal growth in waters with too much phosphorus. Eutrophication can include dangerous blue-green algae blooms, which can severely impair aquatic recreation and even prove fatal to pets.

Monitoring data shows high concentrations of phosphorus in rivers and streams across Minnesota. Over a quarter of monitored rivers and streams exceed the draft river eutrophication criteria for phosphorus. Our 2012 State of the River Report showed that the metro area still sends too much phosphorus downstream to Lake Pepin and beyond.

River eutrophication standards

The U.S. EPA has called on states to develop such nutrient criteria for years, and in 1998, set a goal for all states to adopt numeric standards by 2003. While Minnesota failed to meet the deadline, we have had eutrophication standards for lakes in place since 2008.

In developing the newly adopted river eutrophication standards, the MPCA followed a reasonable and well-established scientific approach. The new standards include:

• Eco-region goals: The eco-region approach uses the state's natural topography, hydrology, land cover and other factors to determine natural river and stream conditions in different parts of the state. Since water bodies respond to inputs differently across landscapes, setting standards based on our state's eco-regions is the most scientifically sound approach to establishing water quality standards.
• Stressor-response criteria: The standards are not simply phosphorus standards for rivers. The standard will examine both phosphorus levels (the stressor variable) and response variables such as oxygen levels and algal growth. No single factor determines violations of the standard; rather, it is whether excessive phosphorus is causing response variables to harm water quality. There is a strong precedent for the use of stressor-response criteria, and FMR applauds the States' efforts to apply this approach.
• Protection of the Mississippi River and Lake Pepin: The standards take into account the unique features of the Mississippi River and its navigation pools, and will adequately protect these waters. The standards also protect Lake Pepin, a natural lake on the Mississippi River downstream of the Twin Cities that is especially susceptible to eutrophication.

The need for standards

Clear standards are needed to manage water resources better and meet water quality goals. Water quality standards establish pollution limits that protect our water resources for benefits like water recreation, fish consumption and healthy plant communities.

If a water body fails to meet the standards, the state can require pollution reduction from those contributing to the problem and help restore our waters to health. Such standards are essential in evaluating water-monitoring data to determine if waters meet state standards.

In addition, the U.S. EPA has long recognized that the adoption of numeric nutrient water quality criteria would allow for:

• easier and faster identification of impairments and development of clean-up plans;
• quantitative targets to support pollution trading programs;
• easier issuance of protective National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits;
• increased effectiveness in evaluating the success of nutrient runoff management programs; and
• measurable, objective water quality baselines against which to measure environmental progress.

FMR believes that adopting these criteria will provide critical protections for rivers and streams across the state, including the Mississippi River and its tributaries. We congratulate the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and thank it for adopting these standards.

Next steps: While the MPCA Citizens Board has approved the standards, the U.S. EPA must still provide final approval. Final approval is expected in the fall of 2014.

More information & next steps

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency website has excellent resources for those who wish to learn more about the state's new water quality standards for rivers and streams. For more comprehensive information, visit the MPCAs Minnesota Nutrient Criteria Development for Rivers (PDF) document.